On 24 November the European Banking Authority published its Risk Assessment Report on EU banks, along with an associated transparency exercise. The mostly dry analysis contained a statistic that prompted a flurry of headlines from financial news outlets.
“European banks slash UK-related assets by €350bn after Brexit vote” wrote the Financial Times, while Bloomberg said, “Brexit Spurs European Banks to Trim Exposure to U.K. Assets”.
The EBA data that sparked these headlines was a before-and-after Brexit comparison of EU bank exposure to the UK. In June 2016, the data showed the total asset exposure of these banks to UK counterparties stood at €1.935 trillion, which had dropped to €1.585 trillion a year later – a €350bn decline.
So did the EU banks really cut back UK exposure in the way implied by the FT and Bloomberg?
What happened in bank risk last year?
Handicapping Goldman’s 1MDB liabilities
Where would the market be without share buybacks?
Is size becoming a risk for S&P 500 stocks?
